Skip to content

8335252: Reduce size of j.u.Formatter.Conversion#isValid #3609

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

phohensee
Copy link
Member

@phohensee phohensee commented May 22, 2025

Clean backport to fix a regression resulting from JDK-8263038. No semantic change, test/jdk/java/util/Formatter tests pass.


Progress

  • JDK-8335252 needs maintainer approval
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8335252: Reduce size of j.u.Formatter.Conversion#isValid (Enhancement - P4 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3609/head:pull/3609
$ git checkout pull/3609

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3609
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3609/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3609

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3609

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3609.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 22, 2025

👋 Welcome back phh! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 22, 2025

@phohensee This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8335252: Reduce size of j.u.Formatter.Conversion#isValid

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 23 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 5d866bf17d96bd0f0e4545d7eee5912eda2e3a94 8335252: Reduce size of j.u.Formatter.Conversion#isValid May 22, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 22, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 22, 2025

⚠️ @phohensee This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 22, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 22, 2025

Webrevs

@phohensee
Copy link
Member Author

/approval request Clean backport to fix a regression resulting from JDK-8263038. No semantic change, test/jdk/java/util/Formatter tests pass.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 23, 2025

@phohensee
8335252: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval label May 23, 2025
@GoeLin
Copy link
Member

GoeLin commented Jun 16, 2025

Hi @phohensee
I'm not so sure we need such optimizations and minor changes in 17, which is a quite stable release.
Thanks.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Jun 16, 2025
@phohensee
Copy link
Member Author

Right, but it's a followup to a JDK 17 enhancement which caused a performance regression which we (Amazon) encountered in production and fixed in our internal distro. Thanks for the approval!

@phohensee
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 16, 2025

Going to push as commit 37b9867.
Since your change was applied there have been 24 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jun 16, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 16, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 16, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 16, 2025

@phohensee Pushed as commit 37b9867.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants